Glasspwn 11b Aero Glass For 81 And Watermark Remover
Sep 10, 2015 Anyone using Aero Glass for 10? Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last. Jump to page: wiretap. View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Member Posts: 38. Windows 10 New 11 Aug 2015 #1. Anyone using Aero Glass for 10? Aero Glass for Windows 8.x+. Remove the watermark on the desktop.
You're best of just torrenting the glass8.eu version from Kick Ass, it's the only proper implementation out there but the author is a knob head who refuses to properly license his software like every other developer out there. And honestly, if you call him out on it, he has more rabid fan boys than Five Guys, Burgers and Fries did and the MSFN mods pretty much ban you instantly. He operates a donate and possibly get a license key from it system, which goes against the very purpose of donating, which is something you do from the bottom of your heart and helps support someone, this isn't. TL;DR I'll send you the link in a PM.
Everything is on that page. There are even suggested donations. Yes, the watermark is removed with your license. Once you donate, and get a password you can logon to your support profile and submit your machine code for a key. I'm afraid I have to disagree, dhjohns. That page doesn't mention anything about differences in the software when the user hasn't donated – actually it doesn't imply that donating would change anything at all. It only talks about motivating the developer and a thank you email.
So no, everything's not on that page. Your post right there has more information than the page. One tree hill torrent season 1 episode 1. I'm sorry, I like the software, but a lot of the communication could be better. The policy is that 'all donators separately and independently happen to receive a version without a watermark, and this is not official even though everyone (for example, dhjohns just there) states it as a rule and a fact'? I mean, bigmuscle is certainly entitled to creating whatever licensing terms he wants, but why would anyone want something like this?
What's wrong with openly stating the reward for paying? The current system is confusing until you dive into the forums for stories about donations, and accomplishes. What, that no one has to admit the full software is paid? Is it because silently watermarked freeware (and a 'secret' private full version) would look better to the visitor than straight-up paid software?
Really, I'm interested. B) user talking about removing watermark by paying/buying/donating. Where is this written that it will happen?
Sorry, but if he is paying for something which has not been specified then he is really stupid. It is same as randomly sending money to someone and then saying that I payed him because I want his car. Isn't it stupid? C) again, user talking that he is donating because 'it effectively removes the nag'. Where did he find such information? On my website? No, it is again only his fabricate.jaclaz.
B) user talking about removing watermark by paying/buying/donating. Where is this written that it will happen? Sorry, but if he is paying for something which has not been specified then he is really stupid. It is same as randomly sending money to someone and then saying that I payed him because I want his car. Isn't it stupid? The funniest part is the whole area he has dedicated to managing licenses and activating/deactivation of them, this in itself belies the fact that you are actually buying licenses.
You only gain access to them by donating. He can call it what he wants but blue is blue, the kettle is black and most are only donating to get rid of the watermark. Edited December 25, 2015 by Kelsenellenelvian. .and most are only donating to get rid of the watermark.You know this, how? From statistics, not a really valid way to prove anything of course, but still not that bad at giving hints. Out of 100 posts on the board: • 22 are about some issues with the program • 5 are some discussion on the licensing model and/or abut calling things with their name • 73 are more or less related to either how ugly/intrusive the watermark is or about how to remove it or how to enter the license donation key or on how to give money to bigmuscle to remove the watermark (or on how the donation is connected to watermark removing) Strangely enough there is not a single post (AFAICR) about someone willing to donate some money out of sheer love for the tool. This of course may well mean that tens, hundreds or thousands of people donated a few bucks expressly and only for the development of the tool but since they never attempted to get a license donation key, nor to 'install' it, they never had any issue with the procedure and so they had no reason to post.